July 2, 2022

frieze

The Accomplished Art Purveyors

Review: ‘What Artists Wear,’ by Charlie Porter

Jean-Michel Basquiat liked his clothing the way he liked his artwork: “oversized, off-kilter, chaos in control.” His paint-stained, joint-burned outfits were being really crafted, and typically expensive — he favored the layouts of Rei Kawakubo for Comme des Garçons — but they in no way shed the spirit of his former homelessness: “Always dress just in case,” he’d say. “I might have to sleep on the road.”

In WHAT ARTISTS Don (Norton, $30), the British trend journalist and art curator Charlie Porter treats his subjects as extra than just “style icons.” Making art can be isolating, dispiriting, consuming, he suggests. What a person wears while carrying out it, regardless of whether a smock or blue denims or couture, is “a testomony to this fearlessness, this concentration.”

It is also a testament to their humanity: a response to the canon of deified white gentlemen, a reminder that all artists are mere mortals with bodies that need masking just like ours. What adorns the nonmale (Louise Bourgeois, Mary Manning), nonwhite (Tehching Hsieh, Alvaro Barrington) bodies in this ebook is as substantially self-expression as resistance.

“What can these artists convey to us about how we all use apparel,” Porter asks, “all of us who test to fake we’re not carrying out, all of the time?”

At the Region party for Keith Haring’s new POP shop in New York Metropolis in 1986, Basquiat’s glimpse is pure intuition, and aesthetic: the shirt and trousers of mismatched plaid, beneath a slouchy jacket (most likely Comme des Garçons) and a hat by Kazou. The juxtaposition helps make the artist Francisco Clemente, to his correct, look extra like an accountant, in his stiff, starchy-seeking match and tie.

“Attack clothes,” Cindy Sherman scrawled in her notebook in 1983: “ugly person (experience/entire body) vs fashionable apparel.” The exact calendar year, she released a sequence of self-portraits in Job interview magazine that “questioned style imagery,” Porter writes, which include this photograph in which she wears a tailor-made, imperfectly-fitted jacket-costume (who can say which?) by the French couturier Jean-Paul Gaultier. Rather than fetishizing the garments she wears as items of art in them selves, she sees them as only “a means to an close.”

At 25, David Hammons designed his to start with of a lot of body prints, which brought his name into the community consciousness. It was 1968 and he’d moved to L.A. from Springfield, Unwell., 5 yrs earlier. Bruce Talamon photographed him in his studio in 1974, putting on denims and no shirt, a bottle of infant oil to his appropriate. “He has just poured the oil on his hands and is rubbing them together,” Talamon informed Porter. “He would then rub his oily palms on any section of his system and also onto his outfits and then push that overall body component onto the paper.”

Like a baby’s foot or hand print in a loved ones scrapbook, the end result was a report, a preservation, of a human being and a instant that would inevitably modify with time. “By carrying out entire body prints,” Hammons said, “it’s telling me just who I am and who we are.”

The German Fluxus artist Joseph Beuys was photographed by Caroline Tisdall at the Giant’s Causeway in Northern Eire in 1974, wearing his later-lifetime uniform — white shirt and denims, fisherman’s jacket, felt hat — beneath a fur-lined coat. In accordance to Porter, the uniform “made him one particular of the most recognizable artists of the 20th Century.” But for him, outfits was not basically a “trademark”: Each individual of these parts was each perform and own mythology. The hat, for occasion, he wore to guard his head from the chilly after a aircraft crash (in 1944, when he was in the German Air Pressure) remaining him with a metal plate in his skull. According to his shamanistic beliefs, he claimed the hat “represents yet another sort of head and functions like an additional character.”


Lauren Christensen is an editor at the Guide Overview.